Blogs Blogs

Fri, 22/05/2009 - 13:48

Being with so few (just over 20 million people) in such a large country (about the size of China) Australia can permit not to worry about too many compromises. I come from a small country in Western Europe where coalition governments always battle to get to some compromise. Shortage of space and natural resources makes planning and compromising a European sport. I am used to long discussions about everything, bringing all possible points of view to the table. Those who take part in the `nation-wide discussions` first try to convince the opponent that `he` or `she` is wrong but ultimately both parties aim to come to a compromise. It is like a marriage where you need to compromise to live together happily. In the past, when compromises were less `popular` and everyone was `talked-out`, it frequently resulted in large scale European warfare. Nowadays there is the European Union. Discussions can last for years and people never seem tired to discuss political matters with friends, on the street, on TV or at work.

Australian students speak up

Australians have literally more room to manoeuvre. There is so much space that if you do not like the other’s opinion, you can just move on. It may well be the reason why most Australians don't like to openly express their opinion. Especially when talking about politics or religion, the general Australian would try to change the subject or walk away. Open discussions are rare, though it is not that Australians don’t speak up. Especially at school or university students like to express their opinion, but the discussion ends as soon as somebody disagrees. Australians do not like to convince you that you are wrong. They politely accept that there is a `pro` and a `contra` and that is where matters end. This attitude is reflected in the countries two party political system. Members of Parliament in Canberra usually do not need to find compromises as after each election only one party rules the country.
 

Ask Questions at College or University

It is not surprising that during debates students tend not to ask questions. When the public in a TV-opinion program was asked to present questions to the panel, nobody (!) formulated a question. Instead all speakers took a stand, trying to `convince the audience about what they thought was right. `Taking a stand` goes back to the early child days, where kids are taught to take a stand (on a bucket) and defend their argument as opposed to listening to different arguments, ask questions and learn to explore all sides of the problem. A small percentage of Australians are actively trying to change everything. However they are either patiently ignored or ruthlessly patronised.
 

Benefit of discussion

There is a clear benefit of the Australian way of `non-discussing` and accepting different points of view: it is pleasantly tolerant and more time efficient. Little time is waisted in meetings. Decisions are taken quicker and are more easily accepted by those who oppose; after which people can happily go back to work. Clearly negative is that not necessarily the best (innovative) decision is found and less involvement can lead to a lack of broad support within the community/organisation. The Question is: How could we adapt the best of both worlds? Leave a comment, or even better: try to convince me that I am wrong!
add comments
(1 comments)
0
No votes yet
Your rating: None

Comments

Katrina said:

What i think one of the biggest problems is that Australians are easily offended. If you ask a critical question  they quickly become defensive, which is really annoying when you just want to have a `discussion'. I always feel i have to reassure people and are getting better as using coments such as `oh yes i see what you mean' and agreeing but then doing the `but' comment, but can you explain, but why do you think this, but could it be that.....But i still get the feeling i am been annoying! Maybe i shouldn't worry, `no worries mate', but then i feel frustrated.

Fri, 24/07/2009 - 15:55