Blogs
Tue, 21/04/2009 - 14:17
Dodgy colleges exploiting students, Indian university students being mocked in Melbourne because they openly wear jewellery and speak up loud in the train, racial attacks in Newcastle, misleading education agents in Sydney, these are just some examples from articles in Australian newspapers over the last few months. What is going on? Is Australia becoming a dangerous place for international students?
Mistreatment
Do international students like their stay?
Students unhappy? Waking a sleeping dog
Solution: Tell me how you like Australia
Comments
Hi,
I taught at an international college, and of course through my Strategic Foresight and Entrepreneurship/ Innovation Masters streams have worked in multiple teams with people from all over the world.
My comments are about my experience in that field of international college training, as a teacher, not about the experience of students at universities (in post grad), which is very different and very enriching I think in many cases.
My experience was that the international college/s seem to place a lot of emphasis on policies and procedures, compliance factors for DIMEA, and for their insurance companies or other accrediting agencies. There were policies and records to be kept for it seemed, everything, and the "culture" was that of anticipating there would be mass-cheating efforts.
I find this unusual, and wrong, (more likely, wrongly-interpreted by administrators in colleges) as "best practices in learning" and "assessing competency" in the Australian RTO system encourages things like team activities, real-life workplace scenarios and role plays, and awards "competency" (read: PASSING) on the final outcomes of the actions or responses, not primarily on a series of parrot-like test responses. This is not learning, it was merely memory-based reguritation of words. It is not even necessary that the student comprehended the words well (of course, many did), but just that they could write them down well enough to meet the "corrections" listed as "right". And the stress levels of the "exam" structure and frequency itself was a major factor in student's lives.
I found also that teaching materials were left primarily to grow old and out of date, had multiple errors therein, and unless audited, were "thin" on content and quality. The lessons were designed to be delivered with a focus on classroom learning that mirrored primary school, rather than adult learning principles, and students primarily just were lucky if they had a teacher that provided innovative, deep, complex materials and insights to "real" worklife here in Australia. Many of the students are in courses that they should be undertaking either in an experiential, consultative and project-based manner, or getting some Reconition of Prior Learning/Recognition of Competency for, as they may be in a Certificate in Business, for example, but already hold a Degree in Hospitality - or doing Hospitality, and have an Accounting qual.
I know there are many reasons for these course choices, but also there are ways to address adult learning that offer students and future employers a well-rounded education, with real insights to the differences in working and living in a new country. Cultural differences are very impactful and can be so easily misinterpreted by co-workers (and co-learners!), and these need to be opened up in a safe and analytical forum that creates a learning team in the classroom. The teacher should be a facilitator on multiple levels, not a "marker of tests" as is often the case.
The other issue is that despite having sections related to assisted job-search, assisted housing, counselling and so on, very few students actually benefited from the services as the help was either simplistic (and we are talking about a person who has extra job-search needs, not one who can merely be handed a resume template to fill in) or the housing was not a real match (lots of reasons), and the counselling was seen as potentially "failing" at being a success, or even a threat to the student's chances of passing and being able to stay on in the course/country.
I believe the induction processes may have been far too much information in too short a time period, and a very major revamp of the offerings, including debriefing of teachers experiences through a non-identifiable feedback mechanism may have some value. Whilst I see lots of issues and challenges to these brief ideas (no hope of explaining it all in this short note), I believe some students survive, others fail, not only always through academic reasons but more from social isolation, emotional effects, and poor guidance leading to a series of negative events.
When organisations such as AITD (Aust Institute of Training & Development) exist, individual students are met, relationships and often a solid understanding grows between the teacher and student, and such a plethora of wonderful ways of imparting knowledge are available, it saddened me to teach in such a manner.
Kind Regards
Karen Dempster, Creating Change


(1 comments)